Versions Compared

Old Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Darrell O'Donnell

Saved on

compared with

New Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Darrell O'Donnell

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
3 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members:
5 minGeneral announcementsAll

Updates from TSWG members of general interest to the group.

CEPTF - Mathieu (notes below)

Digital Governance Council - Conformity Assessment - Tim Bouma - governments are becoming active and adoption is wide open (wild 

EIDAS - open letter from EFF (et al.) about freedoms and privacy. 

All Members 10am PT 

2 minReview of action items from the previous meetingChairs
  •  ACTION: Kevin Griffin will draft a proposed Task Force charter for a new TF for standardizing the SAID, CESR, and KERI specs and circulate it at least one week before the next TSWG Plenary meeting on June 21.
20 minTask Force ReportsTF Leads

Technology Architecture TF — Wenjing Chu  Drummond Reed

Report on the 3 remaining action items to reach the second public review draft:

  1. Use Cases. Good progress: a list of 25 canonical use cases has been proposed—see agenda item below.
  2. Glossary. Some progress on the ToIP Glossary Workspace. Major push planned for the first week of July.
  3. Third generation conceptual ToIP stack diagram. Slight progress. Will be the final task to finish.

Trust Registry TF — Andor Kesselman Antti Kettunen  Darrell O'Donnell

Trust Spanning Protocol TF — Drummond Reed Wenjing Chu Samuel Smith 

  • Sam Curren, co-chair of the DIF DIDComm WG, presented a proposed mapping of DIDComm V2 component to the ToIP stack (which may ideally evolve into "DIDComm V3").
  • Samuel Smith made a 2.25 hour presentation last week on his strawman abstract protocol. See the meeting minutes for the full recordings (listen to both NA/EU and APAC). Here are the slides.
  • The next step is for Wenjing to present his recommendations in our June 28 meeting.
  • We will have a hiatus for vacations the first half of July.
  • We hope to arrive at a consolidate strawman by early August.
  • Our goal is a complete Working Draft (and implementation!) by IIW #37 (Oct 10-12).

ACDC TF — Samuel Smith Phil Feairheller 

  • progress, community is growing
  • demo of Qui Identity (https://qui.xyz/) (beta production use) - chaining (ACDC) at granular level 
    • claims as ACDX - and versioned (in tree/graph)
  • Edge client signing - typescript and python

AI & Metaverse (AIM) Technology TF — Wenjing Chu Vikas Malhotra 

  • no update 

Credential Exchange Protocol TF - Mathieu Glaude 

  • kickoff last week
  • aborted this morning (too many conflicts)
  • working asynch (github)
  • goal: list of protocols and criteria (first pass) next week
  • may set a home at OWF when completed
10 minToIP Stack Technical TrajectoryDarrell O'Donnell 

See screenshot #1 below.

Samuel Smith shared that security, privacy, authenticity, and confidentiality are not independent properties, but are dependent upon each other, and that the tradeoffs are critical. So previous approaches

10 minCanonical Uses Cases for the ToIP StackDrummond Reed 

See this new Google doc: Canonical Uses Cases for the ToIP Stack.

Please provide feedback on these 25 use cases: Are they broadly representative of the many common trusted relationship management actions and trust tasks that the ToIP stack can be used for?

5 minsRevised TSWG Plenary and Trust Spanning Protocol TF Meeting SchedulesDrummond Reed 

For the first half of 2023, we have tried a four-week cycle of meetings for the Wednesday 8AM Pacific Time meeting slot: 3 Trust Spanning Protocol TF meetings followed by one TSWG Plenary meeting. It has proved to be very confusing. Thus we propose to simplify things by:

  • Holding Trust Spanning Protocol TF meetings every Wednesday (both NA/EU and APAC) in their current time slots.
  • Scheduling a monthly TSWG Plenary meeting in a different time slot. (Suggestions?)
5 min
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs

Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)

#1

Image RemovedImage Added

...


Decisions

  •  Sample Decision Item

...