You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Meeting Date & Time

This is a special 2-hour meeting of the ToIP Trust Spanning Protocol Task Force in order to have a deep-dive workshop to begin the consolidation stage of our work on the trust spanning protocol (TSP).

See the Calendar of ToIP Meetings for exact meeting dates, times and Zoom links.

Zoom Meeting Link / Recording

NOTE: This Zoom meeting link will be replaced by a link to the recording of the meetings once it is available.

Attendees

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
5 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Agenda review
Leads
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members:
5 minsUrgency vs. Completeness Poll ResultsSam Curren See the poll and results here. If you have not voted yet, please do.
15 minsConsiderations raised by the Two-Layer Design Model Proposal

See this Github discussion for more about the Two-Layer Design Model Proposal. The purpose of this proposal was to see if we could achieve alignment by compartmentalizing which problems were solved where.

Daniel Hardman kicked off discussion with some thoughts about points he has made in the discussion by sharing screenshot #1 below. Among his points:

  • Trust tasks should all use the TSP.
  • A trust task can be multilateral, not just bilaterally.
  • Do all trust tasks need to be verifiable?

Samuel Smith raised questions in this context about different approaches to supporting composability.

Darrell O'Donnell made some points about how TCP/IP required both TCP and IP to gain adoption.

Jo Spencer spoke in favor of the "logical separation" of the proposal.

Sam Curren suggested a specific set of five work items that could be a path forward.

90 minsOpen DiscussionAll
5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Leads

Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)

#1


#2


#3


#4


#5


#6

Decisions

  • Sample Decision Item

Action Items

  • Sample Action Item


  • No labels