You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Meeting Date & Time

  •   This Task Force holds TWO meetings weekly every Thursday at the following times (to cover global time zones - see the Calendar of ToIP Meetings):
    • NA/EU 07:00-8:00 PT / 14:00-15:00 UTC 
    • APAC 18:00-19:00 PT / 01:00-02:00 UTC

Zoom Meeting Links / Recordings

Attendees

NA/EU Meeting

APAC Meeting

Main Goals of this Meeting

1) Discuss setting a new goal for First Public Review Draft: Fall Internet Identity Workshop, Nov 15-17; 2) review and prioritize GitHub issues; 3) discuss top priority issues.

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
3 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members:
5 minAnnouncementsAll

Updates of general interest to TATF members.

2 minReview of previous action itemsChairs

ToIP Technology Architecture Specification Review Topics

Discussion of progress on the working draft of the ToIP Technology Architecture Specification (TAS). Links to relevant documents and diagrams:

5 minsNew goal for First Public Review Draft?Drummond Reed 

Proposal to complete a First Public Review Draft — including putting a GitHub-based public comment process in place — for Fall Internet Identity Workshop, Nov 15-17.

  • There is a JDF contributors agreement that can apply to comments submitted via GitHub.
  • Kevin Dean said that this is the process they followed for public comment at GS1.
  • We agreed that we want to make sure all comments or proposed changes goes through the necessary contribution agreement before being accepted.
  • Tim Bouma made the point that only maintainers can actually accept changes to the core spec.
  • Judith Fleenor pointed out that feedback outside of GitHub must still go be subject to the CLA.
  • ACTION: Drummond Reed to work with Darrell O'Donnell , Christine Martin , Judith Fleenor , Elisa Trevino, and Jory Burson to sort out and set up the public review process in GitHub.
15 minsReview & prioritize TAS GitHub issues

Drummond Reed Wenjing Chu 

Go over our TAS GitHub issues list to determine priority and assign (or resolve) issues.

  • Our current status is 28 open issues and 4 closed.
  • We reviewed the two closed issues (#1 thru #2).
  • For efficient resolution, we made the following process proposals
  • Proposed editors
    • Drummond, Andor, Christine
25 minsDiscuss highest priority issuesAllDive into the issues we have selected as highest priority.
5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs

Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)

#1


Decisions

  • Sample Decision Item

Action Items

  • Sample Action Item


  • No labels