Meeting Schedule
- Thursday March 18th, 2021 10:00 to 11:00 EST / 14:00 to 15:00 UTC / 07:00 to 08:00 PST
Location
Join Zoom Meeting
https://zoom.us/j/99527911892?pwd=MExZT2x1d0Nlb24zclBUMU56b2NPQT09
Meeting Attendees
Agenda Items
Time | Item |
1 min | Welcome & Antitrust Policy |
2 min | Introduction of new members |
1 min | Agenda Review |
10 min | Updates – White Papers in review · Opportunities of Decentralized Resource Identifiers in the Research Landscape · ToIP WP0010: Introduction to ToIP White Paper · ToIP WP0020: Digital Trust Market Place FAQ |
20 min | Trust Assurance White Paper – Scott Perry |
20 min | Author Guideline - DRAFT |
5 min | Submitting deliverables into GitHub – (e.g., Author Guideline, white papers) |
1 min | Liaison – Concepts & Terminology WG |
Recording - Link
Meeting Notes
Agenda & Discussion Notes
- Updates on
- Opportunities of Decentralized Resource Identifiers in the Research Landscape white paper - Carly Huitema received approved by EFWG (March 11,2021) as final deliverable
- ToIP WP0010: Introduction to ToIP White Paper – Victor Golubkov in process of creating Google Docs for community review
- ToIP WP0010: Introduction to ToIP White Paper – Victor Golubkov in process of creating Google Docs for community review
- Decentralized SSI Governance – (Authors Rieks Joosten and Drummond Reed ), a joint EFWG and GSWG deliverable has received draft approval and now ready for review
- Trust Assurance White Paper – Scott Perry
- Scott Perry has authored the chapter Trust Assurance in SSI Ecosystems for the book Self-Sovereign Identity, Copyright 2021 Manning Publications
- The chapter provides a fulsome and generalized explanation of trust assurance in SSI as a resource for any governance/trust assurance framework
- As a ToIP white paper – opportunity for ToIP to provide point of view concerning the aspects promoted/endorsed by ToIP
- Scott Perry requested clarity on concerning review process, look and feel of final publication, assurance regarding legality/references and committing the draft/final deliverable into GitHub – publication must happen quickly once in final format as this resource is being sought after by many external groups and organizations
- Karl Kneis - noted, not worry about committing to GitHub, resources are there for this to happen. More important to focus on writing the white paper and the process for publication will happen. Point was made there is no wrong to socialize/review white papers and any artifact/deliverable can be iterated
- Scott Perry – noted an implementation methodology is being written to compliment content in the chapter
- Note was made of comment from sankarshan concerning the idea of curating specific parts of the wp which need to be improved/refined to set a baseline for feedback as a way to mitigate the situation of receiving numerous feedback on minor issues
- Karen Hand – other members have mentioned the idea of setting up task list for wp, focused around a specific need
- Karen Hand – presented a simpler version of the wp publication process (presented to EFWG and GSWG Special Topics) for authors as well as draft of approved deliverable concerning wp structure/content – together will form Author Guideline.
- Question was asked – who is responsible for submitting draft/final deliverables (specifically wps) into GitHub deliverable portal (White Paper portal is component of Deliverables Portal)
- David Luchuk - no clear guidelines on this topic
- Rieks Joosten – mentioned this question is not specific to WPTF and has been asked in the CTWG and also mentioned the need to understand curation process for wps in order to simplify publication process for authors