Zoom Meeting Link / Recording
Attendees
Samuel Smith Phil Feairheller Charles Lanahan Steven Milstein Peter McCormick Rodolfo Miranda @Daniel Comisar @Kris Kent Bull Neil Thomson Nuttawut Kongsuwan Petteri Stenius Ruth Choueka Trent Larson Kevin Griffin Lance Byrd @cole davis Arshdeep Singh
Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)
| Time | Agenda Item | Lead | Notes |
| 5 min | - Start recording
- Welcome & antitrust notice
- Introduction of new members
- Agenda review
| Chairs | - Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
- New Members:
|
| 5 mins | Review of action items from the previous meeting | Chairs | None (to continue in discussions) |
| 5 mins | Announcements | TF Leads | News or events of interest to members: |
| 5 mins | Reports | Open | - Coverage on signify-ts/signifypy and keria continues to grow (thanks everyone)
- Question...
- You can create a mutltisig AID but not issue a credential?
- Correct... we're working on it.
- did:webs
- Kick off meeting went well, still "pending official TSWG TF", slack channel is there "#provisional-tswg-dw-tf"
- PRs made to Daniel Hardman 's repo from Markus Sabadello Stephen Curran
- Hoping to move to ToIP (after the 23rd)
- Reference implementation in progress:
- Resolver (produce did doc)
- Client
- Meetings Thursday before KERI dev (9am - 10am EST)
|
| 25 mins | Discussion | Open | - IIW Discussion
- 101 sessions already full
- Maybe we'll just yolo a 101 session
- Provenant Demo (with credentials)
- Kent suggested a session describing pulling together the current stack (KERIA/Signifypy/Signify-TS) - perhaps we build off Phils' published "how to do delegated multisig" with the current stack
- Should we merge PTEL (Public Transaction Event Logs) as Addendum to ACDC Spec because we describe different TEL mechanisms for Privacy Protecting Disclosure
- Should we add specific TEL semantics as addendums as opposed to separate specs?
- Kevin thinks it makes snse to merge the two
- Phil wants to argue...
- worried we have two private/public already...
- Plus we have ipex potentially merged in
- maybe too much to add?
- Maybe it makes sense to try the addendums
- One ref to a EL
- then two refs one to public
- one to private
- Resolution - Draft a ACDC spec with addendums
- Continue ACDC Disclosure Mechanisms Discussion
- Bulk Issued Private ACDCs
- Discussion differentiating between permissioned correlation and un-permissioned correlation.
- "Selective disclosure can be considered a type of naive de-identification" - Dr Sam Smith
- Each ACDC has a unique SAID, so it is no longer a point of correlation.
- Like a HDK we're (pre) generating nonces (that can be anchored) and populating the UUID field.
- and aggregate of blinded digests
- becomes the identifier for the revocation
- See recording.
|
| 5 mins | Any other business | Open |
|
| 5 mins | - Review decisions/action items
- Planning for the next meeting
| Chairs |
|
