You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

Meeting Date

The GSWG meets bi-weekly on Thursdays at 11:00-12:00 PT / 18:00-19:00 UTC. Check the ToIP Calendar for meeting dates.

Zoom Meeting Link / Recording

Attendees

Main Goal of this Meeting

TBD

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
5 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members:
5 minsReview of action items from previous meetingChairs
5 minsAnnouncementsTF Leads

News or events of interest to Governance Stack WG members:

  • -
10 minsIssuer Requirements Task Force Update

Scott Perry 

15 minsThird Generation ToIP Stack Diagram DiscussionJohn Phillips 
5 minsAny other business

5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs

Notes

Courtesy of OpenAI GPT-4 Turbo & Langchain

During the Governance Stack Working Group (GSWG) meeting on November 16, 2023, Scott Perry provided an update on the Issuer Requirements Task Force. Here are the key points from his update:

1. Current State of the Document: Scott discussed the current state of the Issuer Requirements document, which had been in development for several months by the task force.

2. Review Process: He announced that a 4-week review process was now open for the document. This review period was an opportunity for members of the GSWG to provide comments, questions, and issues on the document.

3. Document Structure: The document was structured to meet the format of the Governance Meta Model. It was designed to be a sub-document that would comply with the governance metamodel, helping people understand what is part of a governance framework from an issuer's standpoint.

4. Content Focus: The focus of the document was on the requirements of an issuer for consideration in building a governance metamodel compliant governance framework. It included generally accepted topics used by issuers of X.509 certificates, with considerations for how they would apply to verifiable credentials and the associated emerging technology.

5. Feedback and Finalization: Scott sought feedback on the document and suggestions on how to finalize it. He mentioned that the document could potentially be split into a specification, guide, and template based on the feedback received.

6. Glossary Entries: Scott acknowledged that the document might lead to the establishment of new glossary entries in the ToIP Glossary document.

7. Action Items: He emphasized the importance of reviewing the document in 'suggested mode' on Google Docs to allow for track changes and easier consolidation of feedback.

8. Next Steps: The goal was to have all comments reviewed and cleared in time for the next meeting, which would be in four weeks. Depending on the review, the task force would decide whether to approve the document and in what form (specification, guide, or template).

Scott Perry's update indicated that the Issuer Requirements Task Force had made significant progress and was now seeking broader input to refine and finalize the document, ensuring it aligns with the governance metamodel and serves the needs of the ToIP community.

Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)

#1


Decisions

  • Sample Decision Item

Action Items

  • Sample Action Item


  • No labels