You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Meeting Date

The GSWG meets bi-weekly on Thursdays at 11:00-12:00 PT / 18:00-19:00 UTC. Check the ToIP Calendar for meeting dates.

Zoom Meeting Link / Recording

  • Zoom Link
    (This link will be replaced with a link to the recording of the meeting as soon as it is available)

Attendees

Main Goal of this Meeting

Understand the opportunity to create a governance framework for dual-stack interoperability.

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
5 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members:
5 minsReview of action items from previous meetingChairs
5 minsAnnouncementsTF Leads

News or events of interest to Governance Stack WG members:

Scott Perry published a blog about 'How Do Humans Trust', (it received 2,700 views on LinkedIn and many positive feedback).

  • The next IIW starts on 18 April - see here for more details 
10 minsGovernance takeaways from Bhutan’s presentation on NFID given at Ecosystem Foundry WG

Drummond


Jacques von Benecke, the CTO of Druk Investments and Holdings, the company in-charge implementing Bhutan's National Foundational Id or NFID, gave their first ever public presentation, the recording of the talk can be accessed at the Ecosystem Foundry WG link.

Drummond Reed got involved in the project fairly early on and that the switch over to SSI was due to the Drummond's book which was picked by Jacques and his team. He explains that Bhutan skipped federated Ids and went straight to SSI and it was similar to how developing countries skipped over conventional telecom systems and leapfrogged straight into mobile. He mentioned how Bhutan took governance seriously and drafted a National Digital Identity Act to root their project in law. Although the act has not been passed yet, it is in Parliament, and they hope it will be passed in the next session.

Although, the National Digital Identity Act was drafted with the help of outside experts, the act is meant to provide a legal framework for digital identity in the country and ensure governance and regulation of the system. The act follows the Meta model, which designates a governing authority and an administering body, with the administering body responsible for implementing policies and frameworks. The act also includes a public review period and follows many of the recommendations made by Drummond and other SSI experts.

Scott Perry discussed his work with Bhutan on governance, compliance, and accreditation. He mentioned that they have already made decisions on their technical stack and that they need to figure out what rules they want to hold themselves accountable to. Scott notes that the ecosystems of digital trust and identity will require some kind of oversight governance rules and trust assurance schemes, but there are still interoperability issues associated with it. He also said that there is still work to be done on the governance structure, and there are many rules that need to be established.

10 minsSummary of key points from Steering Committee CallDrummond

Drummond Reed to provide takeaways from the Steering Committee Call (22 March)

15 minsCreating two new TFs Scott

Scott Perry will explore the creation of two task forces: 1) Museum Pass TF and 2) Credential Issuer Governance TF.

5 minsAny other business

5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs

Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)


Action Items

  • Advance the Museum Pass Development use case
  • Participants to join the trust registry task force to help define its objectives.
  • The group will brainstorm on the data points that need to be added to the trust registry to ensure interoperability


  • No labels