You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

15, March 2022  — 11:00 PT, 14:00 ET, 18:00 UTC, 19:00 CET

Send an email to utility-foundry-wg@lists.trustoverip.org to request a calendar invite (you can subscribe to the mailing list at lists.trustoverip.org).

RECORDING GOES HERE (North America / Europe):


Attendees

Jessica Townsend

Alex Tweeddale Lynn Bendixsen

Judith Fleenor Markus Sabadello Andre Kudra

Goals

  • Assign action items for next meeting
  • Establish work plan for WG deliverables and workflow guidance
  • Gather agenda suggestions for next meeting

Antitrust Policy

Agenda Items

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minWelcomeJ. Townsend
2 mins

Antitrust Policy Notice

J. Townsend
5 minsAnnouncementsChairs & All

 Discussion on DID rubricJoe Andreou
10 minsAction Item ReviewChairs
  • Engagement with Tech Arch Task Force - working on tech stack for ToIP; layer specific specs for overall stack - Darrell O'Donnell/Drummond Reed co leads
  • Outreach to KochiOrgBook  - Jessica
  • Cross reference the Public Identity Utilities for Digital Trust Ecosystems document against the ToIP formal best practices and table for Layer 1
  • Follow up with rj.reiser@liquidavatar.com on Glossary Task Force progress - Jessica


  • DID Rubric updates - Alex
  • Terms in deliverable -  removed and will tie to ToIP Glossary upon competion
  • Layer 1 Framework with Tech Arch Taskforce; Alex to join call
  • Create a blog to attract new members - new leadership, 2022 initiatives, who to contact and get involved to be posted to website - complete
  • what other utilities are out to join in members - register with ToIP; target specific people with specific request for input 
    • make list of utilities up and coming - contacts - strategy for discussing to become members
  • Utility overviews - schedule for introducing other utilities/guest speakers; update and newly featured - work through updates of DiD Utility Comparison document
  • Relay to broader ToIP the other deliverables we have targeted to garner interest in carrying forward; how do deliverables use artifacts, order to be read - someone comes in new as a beginner and needs to get educated - target upcoming All Hands Call
15 minsWhat's Next

A. Tweeddale/J.Townsend

  • Finalize deliverable - Public Identity Utilities for Digital Trust Ecosystems - an Overview
  • Discussion on next deliverable to prioritize
    • New Deliverable Recommendations
      • KERI acting as layer one
      • Architecture and Compliance - deep dive on layer one set up (GDPR/Data)
      • Broader set of Layer 1 utilities, including DeFi, payments for identity 
      • How do we work towards interoperability in the space of Layer 1s?
      • DiD Utility Comparison - add a descriptor and purpose of the network to help in evaluation of networks
      • Priority Deliverables  - Public Identity Utilities for Digital Trust Ecosystems, Comparison document, DiD Utility Comparison
  • Set up for education session for next UFWG meeting
    • Education sessions - which layer ones do we want to feature/learn more about?
      • KERI
      • EBSI
      • LACCHAIN
      • GLEIF
      • cheqd
      • Sidetree and ION
      • Kilt
      • Native Governance chains: Solana/Polkadot/Cosmos/Aleph Zero
0 minsUpdates on UtilitiesL. Bendixsen

includes those not in run phase

  • ID Union
  • Bedrock
  • KochiOrgBook 
  • cheqd
0 mins

Q&A

N/A

Announcements

  •  

Task Force SOS (Scrum of Scrums)

TF NameMissionMembersStatus

Public Identity Utilities for Digital Trust Ecosystems - an Overview

This document provides a comprehensive framework on how to evaluate whether an existing Layer 1 Public Utility (Utility) will meet your needs as a consumer or considerations that should be made when looking to develop a Self-Sovereign Identity (“SSI”) ecosystem of your own.

Draft in final review

ToIP Layer 1 - Utility Foundry - Google Docs

DID Utility Comparisonhttps://wiki.trustoverip.org/display/~tweeddalex establish list of Best Practices and submit each BP using ToIP Deliverables Process.

Decision Points

Discussion Items

Open Items

Low priority items that failed gain volunteers to champion cause.



  • No labels