Page History

"The missing link between Human Trust and Digital Trust Assurance" for Human Identity that is Soverign Self  (HISS)

Digital surveillance is inherently untrustworthy and transparency over surveillance is missing for people.  Surveillance transparency is necessary to achieve human trustworthiness, and control independent of technology.  There is no trust for human tech only trust frameworks for enterprises and tech itself.  In the work here privacy is understood as human/individual centric, not business, legal and technical centric. This design rule is critical for trustworthy (including digital identity) infrastructure.    For this purpose this task force is tasked with specifying a credential that can be used with and for any identity management technology, including SSI, using International ISO/IEC standards and related Kantara Specifications. 

...

Privacy Controller Credential For Decentralized Human Data Surveillance Governance aka Notice and Consent  

This working effort specifies a regulatory controller from existing standards that apply and can be mapped to any legal authorization for data processing.

...

1. The accountable person may or may not be an employee of the organization. 
2. Different jurisdictions name/define and reference this role differently 
3. Some jurisdictions, like the UK have a data controller registry (DCR), where this binding is public and legally required (benefit in this case, challenge where absent) and the name of the accountable person is publicly available in ICO DCR.  (using blinding identity taxonomy)
4. Some jurisdictions, like the EU require an accountable data controller representative in the jurisdiction where a service is operating, in order to address legal data privacy and security issues that may arise. 
5. 2 or more Controllers might be accountable for processing of personal data.
   1. Identify in context of service for any user the controller and accountable person.
6. The privacy law in some jurisdictions, can itself break privacy law in other jurisdictions by requiring the accountable person information to be published publicly, 
7. Specifies how to axquire a VC (in this case the Privacy Controller Credential) for trust assurance for privacy assurance
8. Gap of an international notice & control protocol and semantics for governance interoperability between domains and jurisdictions.

Specification Objective

1. Develop an extensible controller credential format.

...

• a record format that MUST blind the identity of the accountable person,
• be usable as a linked data in a notice of control receipt, which provides only the controller information required for the purpose of credential use. 
• record and provide a profile of the bound controller credentials in a manner that can show the controlling person before, during and after the use of a decentralized digital identifier.
• control providence that begins with the person making the assertion to the accountable role using laws and standards to bind privacy rights request to a legal entity.

Decentralized Data Governance 

Decentralized Data Governance is the focus of the first Discussion Paper, which aims to look at the overlaps of digital identity surveillance technology and regulator led (regulatory) data governance. This will present the overall architecture and the contribution of certain standards used in the credential, as well as how digital identity specifications and protocols can be deployed to implement decentralized data governance.

Used to make credential

Standards

ISO/IEC 29100 

• interop / usable for applying 29184 (as a compliance tool) 
• interop with 27560 - Kantara Consent Receipt Work 
• future - to use 27560 to interop with 2750 - Privacy by Design 
  • pending open access and usability of ISO Spec, e.g. through a Kantara or National Standards body liaison

...