...
Time | Agenda Item | Lead | Notes |
5 min |
| Leads |
|
10 min | Introductions | All | Since this is a first meeting, short introductions including one or two sentences about each participant's specific interest in this task force. |
5 mins | Review of the TSPTF Charter | Leads | See the Trust Spanning Protocol Task Force charter page. |
15 mins | Review of the ToIP blog post announcing this TF | Leads | This Jan 5 ToIP blog post explains the background and rationale for this task force. |
10 mins | Discuss our starting point | All | Unlike many other working groups or task forces who are "starting fresh" on a new topic, this particular task force has a very specific goal — a protocol definition — based on a relatively very specific set of requirements — the 18 Layer 2 requirements in the ToIP Technology Architecture V1.0 Specification (see Appendix A for an aggregated list). |
10 mins | Collaboration with other groups | All | Given the role of the trust spanning protocol, how do we want to collaborate with other groups that are also doing related work in this area, e.g., DIF, KERI, Hyperledger Aries, OWF, W3C CCG, EUDIW? |
5 mins |
| Leads | Our proposed primary topic for next week's meeting is: how do we want to proceed with our workthe job of drafting this specification? One option is to follow the general IETF path of "proposals -> merged straw man with outstanding issues -> resolved issues to become a draft". Or, in a little more detail:
Can we do this with the goal of taking a first Working Draft to Internet Identity Workshop #36 (April 18-20 in Mountain View, CA)? |
Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)
...