...
This the home page for a draft of the ToIP Technology Architecture Specification (TAS), a proposed Draft Deliverable of the TSWG developed by the Technology Architecture Task Force.
Links
The Working Draft of this specification is proceeding through two stages:
...
Work on the TAS is taking place across a number of documents and repositories:
- TAS NEW WORKING DRAFT 03 Google doc version <== USE THIS VERSION STARTING AUGUST 17 for any comments to sections 1 thru 6
- TAS OLD WORKING DRAFT 02 Google Doc version <== DO NOT USE THIS VERSION (except temporarily Aug 18-20 to make comments in sections 7 onwards)
- Evolution of the ToIP Stack <== NEW proposed companion document
- ToIP Protocol Stack Diagrams (Google Slides) <== All of all our past diagrams (some of which have been copied to TAS Source Diagrams)
- TAS Source Diagrams (Google Slides) <== SOURCE DIAGRAMS used in the TAS
- TATF Google Drive Folder <== WHERE ALL OF THE ABOVE may be found
- TAS GitHub Markdown version <== this is where the spec will eventually move when it complete and ready for publication
- TAS GitHub issues list <== where we are discussing issues that are beyond the scope of Google doc comments
...
Contributors
To comply with the intellectual property rights protections in the charter of the ToIP Foundation (as required by all Joint Development Foundation projects hosted the Linux Foundation), all contributors to this Pre-Draft Deliverable MUST be current members of the ToIP Foundation. The following contributors each certify that they meet this requirement:
- Darrell O'Donnell, Continuum Loop
- Drummond Reed, Evernym
- Wenjing Chu , Futurewei
- Tim Bouma, Individual
- Isaac Henderson, Individual
- Antti Kettunen, Individual
- Jo Spencer, 460degrees / Sezoo
Other contributors MUST also add their name and membership affiliation to the Google doc or wiki page version of the spec as it proceeds through developmentSee the official list of contributors in the Working Draft.
Terminology
In this document, the key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL", when appearing in ALL CAPITALS, are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119.
...