Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Jessica Townsend

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Jessica Townsend

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Judith Fleenor Markus Sabadello Andre Kudra

Richard Esplin Drummond Reed Scott Perry

@anushka

Goals

  • Assign action items for next meeting
  • Establish work plan for WG deliverables and workflow guidance
  • Gather agenda suggestions for next meeting

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minWelcomeJ. Townsend
2 mins

Antitrust Policy Notice

J. Townsend
5 minsAnnouncementsChairs & All Discussion on DID rubricJoe Andreou

Scott Perry - Governance Stack - see discussion points

Velocity Network (focus on education credential) - special guest talk for upcoming working group session

10 minsAction Item ReviewChairs
  •  Engagement with Tech Arch Task Force - working on tech stack for ToIP; layer specific specs for overall stack - Darrell O'Donnell/Drummond Reed co leads
  •  Outreach to KochiOrgBook  - Jessica
  •  Cross reference the Public Identity Utilities for Digital Trust Ecosystems document against the ToIP formal best practices and table for Layer 1
  •  Follow up with rj.reiser@liquidavatar.com on Glossary Task Force progress - Jessica
  •  DID Rubric updates - Alex
  •  Terms in deliverable -  removed and will tie to ToIP Glossary upon competioncompletion
  •  Layer 1 Framework with Tech Arch Taskforce; Alex to join call
  •  Create a blog to attract new members - new leadership, 2022 initiatives, who to contact and get involved to be posted to website - complete
  •  what other utilities are out to join in members - register with ToIP; target specific people with specific request for input 
    •  make list of utilities up and coming - contacts - strategy for discussing to become members
  •  Utility overviews - schedule for introducing other utilities/guest speakers; update and newly featured - work through updates of DiD Utility Comparison document
  •  Relay to broader ToIP the other deliverables we have targeted to garner interest in carrying forward; how do deliverables use artifacts, order to be read - someone comes in new as a beginner and needs to get educated - target upcoming All Hands Call
15 minsWhat's Next

A. Tweeddale/J.Townsend

  • Finalize deliverable - Public Identity Utilities for Digital Trust Ecosystems - an Overview
  • Discussion on next deliverable to prioritize
    • New Deliverable Recommendations
      • KERI acting as layer one
      • Architecture and Compliance - deep dive on layer one set up (GDPR/Data)
      • Broader set of Layer 1 utilities, including DeFi, payments for identity 
      • How do we work towards interoperability in the space of Layer 1s?
      • DiD Utility Comparison - add a descriptor and purpose of the network to help in evaluation of networks
      • Priority Deliverables  - Public Identity Utilities for Digital Trust Ecosystems, Comparison document, DiD Utility Comparison
  • Set up for education session for next UFWG meeting
    • Education sessions - which layer ones do we want to feature/learn more about?
      • KERI
      • EBSI
      • LACCHAIN
      • GLEIF
      • cheqd
      • Sidetree and ION
      • Kilt
      • Native Governance chains: Solana/Polkadot/Cosmos/Aleph Zero
0 minsUpdates on UtilitiesL. Bendixsen

includes those not in run phase

  • ID Union
  • Bedrock
  • KochiOrgBook 
  • cheqd

None

0 mins

Q&A

N/A

Announcements

...

TF NameMissionMembersStatus

Public Identity Utilities for Digital Trust Ecosystems - an Overview

This document provides a comprehensive framework on how to evaluate whether an existing Layer 1 Public Utility (Utility) will meet your needs as a consumer or considerations that should be made when looking to develop a Self-Sovereign Identity (“SSI”) ecosystem of your own.

Alex Tweeddale

Lynn Bendixsen 

Jessica Townsend


Draft in final review - ToIP Layer 1 - Utility Foundry - Google Docs

DID Utility Comparisonhttps://wiki.trustoverip.org/display/~tweeddalex establish list of Best Practices and submit each BP using ToIP Deliverables Process.

Alex Tweeddale

DID Utility Comparison - Google Sheets

Decision Points

...

Rubric with criteria for choosing a utility to support evaluation

Alex Tweeddale

Alex Tweeddale 





Decision Points

Discussion Items

Layer specific governance framework - Governance Working Group - trust assurance framework for blockchain utility layer - what are the rules that a network would want to follow, what would be the standard set of rules associated with utilities - bring into template to bring out to market. Governance stack working group meeting on the 24th March, 11am PT/2pm ET. Standard/Common roles and processes - layer 1 will see the most diversity

Updates to the Public Identity Utilities for Digital Trust Ecosystems - an Overview deliverable - more visual framework on a wiki. Added broad differentiators and standards - explain on tech and standards level how they compare. Comparison of other base protocols along with Hyperledger Indy. Addition of scoring system with questions aligned to the scoring criteria categories - questions meant to be answered in more yes/no format. Document could be used as the basis for the Governance Stack discussion

  • Work to create rubric for considerations when choosing a utility that can be used by individuals to evaluate. A sample will be provided. Need to ensure that there is clear definition
  • Should consider adding a couple of questions re: Security considerations and Maintenance - what is the frequency
  • Future considerations - add whether Quantum ready

Reschedule Joe Andreou to join next call - ensure tie in to DID Rubric framework

Time Zone challenges - KochiOrgBook team - APAC specific call, Alex could provide update

Open Items

Low priority items that failed gain volunteers to champion cause.

...