Meeting Date & Time
This Task Force meets three out of every four Wednesdays (the fourth Wednesday is the Technology Stack WG plenary meeting). There are two meetings each Wednesday to serve different time zones:
- NA/EU meeting: 08:00-09:00 PT / 16:00-17:00 UTC
- APAC meeting: 18:00-19:00 PT / 02:00-03:00 UTC
See the Calendar of ToIP Meetings for exact meeting dates, times and Zoom links.
Zoom Meeting Links / Recordings
- NA/EU Meeting: https://zoom.us/rec/share/_Rf0dGbj4M34vY2736n2ZJXe5hMS0gAshpq0QnvbZy0lCYOLOe-99Bx4Oii-caS4.uRj5aPAm6oWFMFsj
- APAC Meeting: https://zoom.us/j/93647624275?pwd=YlJTOWhmTnBEcWtKNTkwOFVQMkNaQT09
NOTE: These Zoom meeting links will be replaced by links to recordings of the meetings once they are available.
Attendees
NA/EU:
- Drummond Reed
- Daniel Hardman
- Wenjing Chu
- Samuel Smith
- Darrell O'Donnell
- Alex Andrei
- Antti Kettunen
- Clare Nelson
- Daniel Bachenheimer
- Judith Fleenor
- Lance Byrd
- Mathieu Glaude
- Michal Pietrus
- Neil Thomson
- Rodolfo Miranda
- sankarshan
- Scott Perry
- Scott Whitmire
- Steve McCown
- Steven Milstein
- Subhasis Ojha
- P A Subrahmanyam
- Viky Manaila
- Vladimir Simjanoski
APAC:
- Drummond Reed
- Dima Postnikov
- Eric Drury
- Jo Spencer
- Wenjing Chu
- Samuel Smith
- Alex Tweeddale
- Daniel Bachenheimer
- Michael Herman
Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)
Time | Agenda Item | Lead | Notes |
3 min |
| Leads |
|
2 min | Review of previous action items | Leads |
|
5 mins | LAST CALL FOR PROPOSALS & prep for TSP Workshops | Drummond Reed | After today's Proposal #3 Part B from Wenjing Chu, we need to know if there are any other proposals in our proposal stage. If so, please speak up now. Secondly, Neil Thomson and others have suggested that as we move into our consolidation stage, we are going to need one or more "Special TSP Workshops" of at least 2-3 hour duration.
APAC: Jo Spencer asked if "the end of the proposal stage" will mean that we won't continue looking at other protocols. Drummond said that Wenjing's presentation today will address part of that. Michael Herman observed that each of the four proposals take a different approach to describing their vision and proposed design for the TSP — like describing four animals that all have four legs but are not the same animal (Jo Spencer said "camels and dromedaries as well as horses and zebras"). He pointed to this new Github discussion thread he started that asks questions about how we will proceed with the consolidation phase. Wenjing suggested that his presentation may partially answer Michael's question. |
40 mins | Proposal #3 Part B: Wenjing Chu | Wenjing Chu | Wenjing will present Part B of his Proposal #3. A handful of screenshots from his presentation are shown below. |
10 mins | Q&A on the above | All | NA/EU: Daniel Hardman asked what Wenjing meant by "backwards compatibility" for ITDP.
Clare asked about the mobile use case on slide 63 — would that include the mobile device? And how would that be implemented?
Darrell O'Donnell: Are we looking for backwards compatibility now (compatible to what?) Or are we planning for backwards compatibility? Neil Thomson: "Observation - a large part of interop is likely to be on governance and verifiable authority (initially) vs technical compatibility. For example, OIDC provides a non-DID identifier that OIDC is prepared to provide a verifiable authority (signing of the identifier) to providing backing -> VID" APAC: |
| Leads |
Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
Decisions
- Sample Decision Item
Action Items
- Sample Action Item