Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
3 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • New member introductions
  • Agenda review
Chairs
  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.
  • New Members:
2 minReview of previous action itemsChairs
40 minsTSP Proposal #2: Daniel HardmanDaniel Hardman 

Daniel will present his proposal for design of the TSP based largely (but not completely) on his experience as an architect of DIDComm

15 minsQ&A on Proposal #2

APAC:

  • Michael Herman shared screenshot #1 below as a way of illustrating the credential sender-receiver model. A video of this Internet Credential (InterCredential) Architecture Reference Model 0.70 ft. 4-Corner Interop Model is available here.
  • Michael also shared screenshot #2 to discuss interfaces between senders and receivers in a series of protocol usages.
  • We had a good discussion about Daniel Hardman's proposed "destination" element and the challenge of multiple recipients and group messaging.
    • Drummond pointed out this was intentionally put out of scope for the DIDComm V2 Working Group, but that they are keen on tackling it in a subsequent version.
    • Andor Kesselman said he plans to raise this question in the Proposal #2 discussion thread.
  • At the end of the all, Drummond Reed pointed out one of the final slides in Daniel Hardman's deck (screenshot #3) that maps many of the features of the DIDComm V2 basic protocol (and other "DIDComm protocols" built on top of the basic protocol) to the ToIP stack, both at the TSP layer (Layer 2) and at the trust task layer (Layer 3). In his view, that slide could be worthy of an entire dedicated TSPTF meeting to discuss in depth — and certainly should be discussed in depth in Github Discussions.
0 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs

Next week's meeting will be Proposal #3 from Wenjing Chu.

Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)

#1

#2

#3

Image Added

Decisions

  • None.

...