Info

See ToIP calendar for cancellations, etc.

did:webs Task Force
10:00 – 11:00am ET
Weekly on Friday, until Dec 22, 2024

Location:

https://zoom.us/j/92492310278?pwd=Um1uSWljTkRoQjdwaG52WHlsZmNXZz09

Meeting Recording Link

Posted after the meeting:

Video Recording

Audio recording

Attendees

Lance Byrd 

Kent Bull 

Charles Lanahan 

Ed Eykholt 

Henk van Cann 


Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
5 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
5 minsReview of action items from previous meetingChairs
5 minsAnnouncementsTF Leads

Tech stack WG has a new mailing list for the new charter. This is part of the acceptance of the new IP, etc. Open Web Foundation licensing.

5 mins

Reports

Open
25 minsDiscussionOpen

Catchup on final changes status:

  • Diagraming in ToIP
    • An index of diagrams would help
      • a markdown table that provides metadata/context that allows for the community to determine the usefulness/reputation of the diagram.
      • Lets start with KERISSE (at least for KERI related diagrams?). Perhaps this will expand to the wider ToIP ecosystem.
        • Broken links checker is automated and will help us maintain.
        • Medium articles can be scraped as well.
    • Diagrams should be close to their origin (ie. in the repo it applies to) but linking can lead to drill-down, discovery, and more
      • Discussions on the diagram occur within the repo. It may prompt discussion at a higher level (repo), etc.
    • Needs to be very dynamic, PRs etc. will result in updates, removal, etc.
    • Some are informational, some map a spec, some are future ideas, etc.
    • A decentralized model is necessary in order to maintain what diagrams are important, useful, out-of-date
  • Implementors draft, to get multiple implementations to verify the steps
    • Quality check on the spec
    • Should be able to show interop between implementations
    • This allows us to enter 'final' public review
    • This should be socialized that more implementations are needed as a next step that we would like to help support
  • Separating the admin control from did:web, to provide separate signing control is a big step.
    • Wording this in a way that helps those outside our community to understand/appreciate that step is extremely valuable.
  • What needs to be completed to enter the public review process?
5 minsAny other businessOpen


5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs
  • Lance Byrd will update the spec version and add a section asking for additional reference implementations to exercise and improve the spec and to show interop with our python hyperledger-labs reference impl
  • Lance Byrd will cleanup co-chair lists
  • Lance Byrd will define the minimal interoperability profile for did:webs spec.... then we can define additional profiles that include the optional/nice-to-have features like whois .
  • Take a look at Ed's diagram https://github.com/trustoverip/tswg-acdc-specification/issues/77 to discuss (quickly) next week.
  • Henk van Cann and Kor Dwarshuis will work on the KERISSE-engine maintained diagrams & images list:

    1. metadata table pointing to (URLs) - and describing images and diagrams with addition options (reputation, level, status, etc.)
    2. a search option in KERISSE with only images, based on a scrape-function Kor has already written: getTextAroundImage
    3. the broken link checker reports every Monday that the images are still out there