You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Attendees

Agenda Items

Time ItemWho
1 minWelcomeChair
5 minIntroductionsEveryone
5 min

Drafting Group Overview & Antitrust Policy Notice

Trev Harmon


Review of Key Interoperability Questions & ApproachEveryone
3 minWrap upChair 

Presentations -

Error rendering macro 'viewpdf'

com.atlassian.confluence.macro.MacroExecutionException: com.atlassian.confluence.macro.MacroExecutionException: The viewfile macro is unable to locate the attachment "Security & Privacy – Introductory Information.pdf" on this page

Security & Privacy – Introductory Information.pdf

Notes

  1. Welcome
  2. Did round of introductions.
  3. Presentation of the overview deck and Linux Foundation antitrust policy.
  4. Pagona presented the challenge and the key interoperability questions.
    1. Daryl noted that for the Caribbean that there's no specific laws, and that application often comes from external governments.
    2. Our group's questions span all three zones.
    3. Drummond noted that governance is expecting an architecture where the governance framework would state the overall requirements for other governance frameworks that would cover specific implementations. It gives a mechanism to specify what needs to be done and part of these other governance frameworks. We don't need a one-size-fits-all solution.
    4. Pagona noted that we need to be principle based.
    5. Group agreed this is the right structure to advance the work.
  5. The group was asked to provide where their expertise and desires would best fit into the work.
    1. Members of the group will have different levels of interaction with the different key interoperability questions.
    2. Discussed the fact that NIST 800-63-3 should also be referenced.
  6. We discussed how cross-pollination between groups will happen.
  7. Main challenge: how are we going to draft for question #3 without seeing outputs from other groups, as we should address specifics in our answer.
  8. Then discussed the assessment side of things in terms of our groups output. It may be an addition/replacement for key interoperability question #3.
  9. Drummond suggested the creation of a single document for participants to be able to provide responses and feedback on the questions, as well as raise additional questions.
  10. Discussed next meeting time. The current plan is to meet on Tuesdays and Thursdays. We want to be inclusive, so there will be a Slack poll to find out if this current time works (sufficiently) for all members.

Action Items

  1. Trev Harmon to:
    1. create a Google Doc for use in collaboration;
    2. create Slack poll for meetings; and
    3. announce related information in Slack.
  2. Participants to read materials and start to provide reactions.



  • No labels