Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

https://zoom.us/j/92492310278?pwd=Um1uSWljTkRoQjdwaG52WHlsZmNXZz09

Meeting Recording Link

Video recording

Audio recordingPosted after the meeting

Attendees

Lance Byrd 

Charles Lanahan 

Stephen Curran 

Henk van Cann 

Cole Davis 
Drummond Reed 

Agenda Items and Notes (including all relevant links)

TimeAgenda ItemLeadNotes
5 min
  • Start recording
  • Welcome & antitrust notice
  • Introduction of new members
  • Agenda review
Chairs
5 minsReview of action items from previous meetingChairs


  •  Stephen Curran and Drummond Reed and John Jordan will start an additional blog post related to the whois features of did:webs Samuel Smith will pursue the IANA CESR MIME type registration within the ACDC TF, 
    •  Provisional registration is short-term
    •   Lance Byrd will follow up with Sam about IANA registration and document it for us
5 minsAnnouncementsTF Leads

Tech stack WG has a new mailing list for the new charter. This is part of the acceptance of the new IP, etc. Open Web Foundation licensing.

5 mins

Reports

Open
25 minsDiscussionOpen

Catchup on final changes status:

  • What needs to be completed to enter the public review process?
    • Whois review
    • All public review changes should be well documented so that they can watch the process
      • Normative vs Informative information in the spec is important prior to release https://github.com/trustoverip/tswg-did-method-webs-specification/issues/120
        • Work backwards from the normative statements. Triage informative to minimum.
          • If you start with these bones it's easier to hang all of the minimal informative information and move everything else outside of the spec.
        • Informative that isn't needed in the spec
          • Appendix
          • Implementation guide
            • spec is separate
            • reference impl is separate
            • Graph diagram could be in the impl guide
          • Explain why in a separate paper
    • Service endpoint section updates
    • KERIpy release candidate https://pypi.org/project/keri/#history
    • How can contributors help?
      • what are the biggest risks, etc.

See the ToIP template, might have ISO influence

5 minsAny other businessOpen


5 mins
  • Review decisions/action items
  • Planning for next meeting 
Chairs
  •  Lance Byrd will go back through informative links and cleanup the bracketing from the previous technique. Remove 'See' sections that list links.
  •  We'd like Darrell O'Donnell Drummond Reed Judith Fleenor to review our first pass at breaking down the normative/informative statements.