Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Weds 1st Mar - 07.00 UTC =23:00 PT = 13.30 IST = 18:00 Melbourne = 14:00 Bangkok = 17:00 Singapore = 18:00 Seoul 

Zoom Meeting Link  https://zoom.us/j/93269246277?pwd=TzB0RmFwSkU5WDNFeFJHUHllbnRvQT09

Meeting Recording APAC Call

Thursday 2nd Feb - 17.00 UTC = 09:00 PT = 12.00 ET =18:00 CEST = 21:30 IST

Zoom Meeting Link https://zoom.us/j/94655082399?pwd=QXdLL3Rxakt4WnFCS3NvejdLWkJjUT09

Meeting Recording USA / EU Call

Main Goal of this meeting:  Agenda for the year

Attendees APAC: sankarshan Jill Bamforth, 

Attendees USA/EU: 


TimeItemLeadNotes
5 mins
  • Welcome & antitrust notice

  • Agenda review

Andrew

  • Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role.

  • Join ToIP if not already a member
    • Consent to meeting recording?
10minsIntro's & Updates

Andrew

Reminder that if you want to add the calendar to your own calendar then see this link Calendar of ToIP Meetings

Harms Paper: final public feedback by end of March - V2 if substantial comment

Note that one aspect of the feedback on the paper from Jill Bamforth has not been further discussed - See this document for notes capture.

Also practical application for different groups:

  • Policy makers
  • Implementers

Challenge of MVP vs MvirP - problem with time

sankarshan commented that all want to do the right thing, but need for having things to specifically look for. Easy to do when launching a new product, more difficult if in-life product.  ie retrospective fixing. 

e.g. in edtech and social media for young adults / teens.  Is it possible to have a checklist or scenarios / threat models same approach on risk

https://takeitdown.ncmec.org/ <— so this project y’day. Have not read through the FAQ completely
And the other thing which caught my eye is https://cyberscoop.com/jen-easterly-secure-by-design/ (not necessarily related to harms but about safety and better design as well as accountability)

e.g. Diksha data breach and data for sale on dark web, but only now the DPA taking place.  Data minimisation should have happened right out of the gate.

Nicky Hickman hoped that the cheat sheet would highlight very practical things that could be done

Jill writing a paper at the moment that looks at ToIP stacks for businesses wanting to make relevant to businesses who wanted to look from the end-user / customer perspective.  

literature between trust and confidence; self-determination theory ie if you can enhance autonomy, competency and relatedness; CSR and the idea that if an organisation seeks to improve their CSR without being driven by legal requirements that builds trust in the organisation.

Also - what am I looking at?  How does credentialing fit with harms piece, how can we make it meaningful to non-technical teams?

How to explain to SME business managers - want something practical to do with the information.  Distinguishing between Trust & Confidence - papers to be uploaded to slack.  EG trust as relationship between two parties under a condition of uncertainty; vs confidence belief that the expectations will be met.

Deflippi - how blockchain builds trust and confidence - raises issue that if you have confidence in the systems and the systems are driven by protocols then in a way that replaces trust. 

rationality vs bounded rationality eg the need for belonging vs financial gain

10 mins WG Chairs

Both Nicky & Kalin stepping back / sabbatical

Volunteers to co-chair or vice-chair with Andrew

Ways of working....

1) New co-chairs BAU

2) Focus on Interaction Patterns TF

3) HX @ large

Tasks to complete before time out:

  • Wiki updates (Nicky)
  • Harms TF cheat sheet (Nicky)

Jill - which alternative groups could HXWG members contribute to?

@nicky recommended Ecosystem Foundry Working Group, also the GSWG.  Eric Drury based out of APAC timezone

sankarshan fine to take time out from the group, work can continue in other groups until relevance/momentum returns

Jill suggested putting out list of topics/questions then take 6 months to review those questions / gather background research


30minsInteraction Patterns Task Force30minsIP TFAndrew

Small but perfectly formed group - clear on mission and next steps 

Show and tell on patterns and interaction mechanisms based on the background work

Alternate Thursdays at 17.00 UTC (9am PT) next meeting is on Thursday 9th

OWF

Interaction Patterns Task Force

sankarshan seeking the recording so that he can follow asynchronously. Also looking at security aspects around the wallet. So interested in TF but timing is bad for attendance.

Jill Bamforth - would be good to still maintain connections and bring ideas in.

sankarshan suggested put out the call, ideally EU timezone, but issues with too many groups / TFs - making folks aware that they can join and contribute / lead.

5 minsAOB & ActionsAndrew

Nicky Hickman to do wiki updates & harms cheat sheet

Nicky Hickman to put out request to all members, also forge academic connections.

Nicky Hickman to arrange for meeting recording to add to the IP TF page.