...
Meeting Recording to come.
Attendees: Nicky Hickman Darrell O'Donnell Christine Martin Neil Thomson
Agenda:
Time | Item | Lead | Notes |
5 min | Welcome & antitrust notice Agenda review | Nicky | Antitrust Policy Notice: Attendees are reminded to adhere to the meeting agenda and not participate in activities prohibited under antitrust and competition laws. Only members of ToIP who have signed the necessary agreements are permitted to participate in this activity beyond an observer role. |
10min | New intro's & Updates | Darrell O'Donnell will be at IIW, Neil Thomson co-chair of Data Modeling &___ WG authentic data vs authentic identity, follow on from ISWG many others on same track, triangle similar to issuer, holder, verifier, but different. One issuer, thousands of data providers. How are these sources and issuers different? what denotes authenticity, consent etc - how do these fit together e.g. DIF Data Agreements Group, same with Consent, discussions about the process/agreement, but not about the data. | |
40min | White Paper Review key questions | Nicky | Many reviewers and excellent comments on the paper leading to improvements on the paper. Many discussions needed going forward, further work. Continuing the discussion: Overcoming Harms_Further Discussion Document, initially including detailed and thought provoking commentary from Jill Bamforth. Progress against ToDo's
"A colleague asked me a question today "do you have a personal data harms stat that you can share that will help me shake up an executive? A stat that is so blatantly damaging that it will compel them to invest in the development of personal information management solutions and lean into being a personal information economy leader." Harms are costs: they cost businesses billions in customer services, abuse management systems, security, fraud management, reputational damage and opportunity cost. At the same time they cost every public purse billions mopping up the after-effects e.g. healthcare, benefits, national cybersecurity, ... As soon as that senior exec realises that the microharms not only impact his bonus, but also his taxes your friend will have his attention! Is there a business case for addressing harms, or is it a moral endevour? Darrell O'Donnell - need concrete examples. Impact on employees of firms. Neil Thomson - many things that may be done are additional benefits of using SSI, security benefit. Future-proofing also a benefit, freebies by adopting SSI.
Key Terms for final version & publication
|
5mins | AOB & Close | Nicky | Worthwhile effort! We are looking at this and considering in our designs |
2022-10-27 BGBU APAC TF Meeting
...