2022-
...
04-
...
11 BGBU TF USA/EU TF
...
Meeting
6.00 UTC = 22:00 PT = 7:00 CET = 10:30 IST = 17:00 Melbourne = 13:00 Thailand
Zoom Meeting Link 15.00 UTC = 8:00 PT = 11.00 ET = 17:00 CET = 20:30 IST Zoom Meeting Link https://zoom.us/j/9512110956797159895478?pwd=UFBrWU5PcC9RZS9UaFg1UG81WGZZdz09 Meeting ID: 951 2110 9567 Passcode: 08217emFjbU8xdWs0dE5iaE0zeDVZREFYQT09
MEETING RECORDING
Attendees:
Agenda: We will follow the same agenda as the USA / EU Meeting with additional APAC notes in Green
Agenda
Time | Item | Lead | Notes |
5 min | | Darrell | |
5 mins | Intro's new members & Updates | All | New Members Updates - Links & References: Please use this Responsible Tech Resources page to capture links to media or online resources that can help us with our work. Responsible Tech Resources All are updated now
- SSI Harms now changed on wikis, slack & calendar invites etc to BGBU
- Our First Deliverable Storyboard, is open for business here. Aim is to have key questions/ discussion points ready for IIW by end of month
|
5 mins | Update on Actions from Previous Meetings | All | - ACTION - Darrell to clone storyline format (from Drummond)
- ACTION - ALL to review background links (on Purpose page under Links & Files)
- ACTION - Persona Development
- ACTION - reach out to others to join or be an 'expert witness'
- John Phillips to ask https://sigchi.org/ if they have any kind of framework for assessing interaction harms
- Nicky Hickman to get kinship structures / forms from anthropology notes
- Eric Weltonto discuss domicile law and issues related to documentation and also on biometrics work next time. Bound carefully with exam question. Close during that session.
|
30 mins | Discussion Scope: Root Cause Analysis & Frameworks | Nicky | Scope & clarification from USA Call - Suggested from USA call - that we de-scope to only focus on the new harms that could arise from use of SSI - do we agree?
- Support from USA group to use persona for storytelling, but interview real people on the ground to carry out research and understand harms.
- Recommendation from USA group that we do not exclusively focus on marginalized or vulnerable people, as we are all vulnerable at different times of our lives (e.g. as children, as frail elderly), however using extreme users or edge cases as persona can support robust design
Root Cause Analysis? - Is part of the problem that many think SSI is specifically designed to address harms of Web 1.0 & 2.0?
- Is part of the problem that SSI is designed with a specific Western Educated Industrialised R Democratic perspective on the nature of human identity, the format of families, marriage, kinship and naming conventions? An ego-centric (individual) rather than socio-centric (dividual) view of identity.?
- Must go deep to challenge the underpinnings of SSI - the problem of digital imperialism
- One core under-pinning value is personal agency - this is based on principles of 'free will', this in turn is tied up with our ideas of free speech, free trade and is baked into our belief systems. This is why it is so challenging.
Possible Frameworks: - Creates or uses existing framework for analysing the dangers, risks, potential harms and threats (DRiPHT) to people with a particular focus on excluded, marginalized or vulnerable people.
- RIGHTS-BASED sankarshan's Digital Identifiers & Rights
- HARMS -BASED Me2B Alliance Digital Harms Dictionary. Uses DJ Solove's Privacy Taxonomy or Koops et al Typology to classify digital harms
- ROLES - BASED: What are the unintended consequences of SSI or digital ID benefits on our chosen persona: Children, Refugee, Indigenous People: e.g. McKinsey. Digital Identification, a key to inclusive growth or Kaliya Young The Domains of Identity
Image Added Image Added 4. SECTOR-BASED - prioritizing the primary sectors of uptake that ToIP members want us to look at and which impact against sustainable livelihood outcomes Healthcare Public Sector National Identity & Legal Identification Financial Services & Fintech 5. OUTCOMES-BASED Sustainable Livelihoods framework . Based on the principle that your digital data is a livelihood asset, a new form of capital? Or a digital representation of other types of capital? Harms arise when the outcomes or consequences negatively impact positive livelihood outcomes - More income
- Increased wellbeing
- Reduced vulnerability
- Improved Food Security
- More sustainable use of NR Base
Image Added More likely a combination of a couple of these?
|
10 mins | Storyboard | Darrell | |
5 mins | Close & AOB | Nicky | |
2022-03-28 BGBU Task Force USA/EU TF Meeting
...