Attendees

Agenda Items

Time ItemWho
2 minWelcome & Antitrust Policy NoticeTrev

Discussion on FormatsEveryone

Discussion on Signature Suites

Everyone

3 minWrap upChair 

Notes

  • Welcome and Linux Foundation antitrust policy
  • Daniel opened up the Key Interoperability Questions documents for review.
  • According to the responses in the document, there appears to be some collalessing around using the JSON-LD and BBS+, though this will need to be a phased approach.
  • Daniel isn't seeing that any of the existing formats are W3C VC compliant.
  • Elli reported that the EU hasn't decided their position on verifiable credentials. It is to be decided later.
  • Viky also reported that eIDAS has also looked at W3C vCs, as well.
  • Drummond presented a slide regarding credential- and pass-related taxonomies (this is only a draft). https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1fM-EpIdLGdKniFjHR4ZhdgFA-HBSEmpMai8ljqti4Gw/edit?usp=sharing
  • The key differentiation between a credential and a pass is that a credential contains a full set of data, while a pass is only a subset of that data that is needed by a verifier; it's context specific.
    • Daniel asked if "paper credential" really means machine-readable or a representation of digital.
    • A digital pass can be created from a digital credential, but it doesn't have to be.
    • Every leaf node on this diagram is expected (for GHP-compliance) to have a digital signature.
  • Drummond showed the glossary that is being worked on by the Governance Framework drafting group. All other groups are invited to contribute. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kznth0dRg2xdFe9MX0p4rE-FLI0w_Nmt1ceip9gdMmo/edit?usp=sharing
  • Areiel noted that it's not just about what the paper cred is, but also how it is created in such a way that governments will accept.
  • We discussed a little on trust registries.

Chat Log

00:05:56	Elli Androulaki:	Hi, can you please share the link to that google doc ? Thanks!
00:06:20	Viky Manaila:	https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1NZj0h5bawLtcanPnm3IBjA6jtgZwvgtn
00:10:11	Elli Androulaki:	thanks!
00:24:32	Kaliya Identity Woman:	or PDF 417
00:37:08	Drummond Reed:	Glossary: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Kznth0dRg2xdFe9MX0p4rE-FLI0w_Nmt1ceip9gdMmo/edit?usp=sharing
00:38:23	Drummond Reed:	Google Slide deck - see slides 11 to 17 for the credential / pass taxonomy: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1fM-EpIdLGdKniFjHR4ZhdgFA-HBSEmpMai8ljqti4Gw/edit?usp=sharing
00:40:54	Drummond Reed:	+1 to the need for paper creds to be flexible enough to meet the requirements of different verifiers.
00:49:23	Matthias L. Jugel (UBIRCH):	yes please
00:49:48	Trev Harmon:	+1 to Kaliya's comment.
00:54:16	Elli Androulaki:	+1
00:55:03	Elli Androulaki:	+1 to the paper creds being flexible to meet different verifiers reqs
00:55:11	Drummond Reed:	+1
00:58:56	Drummond Reed:	+1 to Riley’s point that we essentially need a complete spec.
01:00:22	Jim StClair:	++1
01:01:19	Trev Harmon:	Thanks everyone
01:01:23	Trev Harmon:	Need to drop.
01:02:37	Drummond Reed:	This document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10TwmrSW16Vv3TjtkhtL5BFm6kjAMi--M20ewo7So6fQ/edit#
01:03:11	Daniel Bachenheimer:	this DRIVE: https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/1NZj0h5bawLtcanPnm3IBjA6jtgZwvgtn


Action Items