Versions Compared

Old Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Trev Harmon

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user David Luchuk

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Credential Formats – Introductory Information.pdf

Notes

  1. Welcome and Linux Foundation antitrust policy
  2. Did a quick run through of the overview deck.
  3. Did a round of introductions.
  4. Reviewed the four areas that we are working on. Ideally, we will be able to decide on one option in each of these areas:
    1. Data Format(s)
    2. Digital Signature Suite(s)
    3. Presentation and Exchange Protocol(s)
    4. Revocation Mechanism(s)
  5. Having more options available greatly increases the amount of work for interoperability on the development side.
  6. Riley suggested that we should define scope in terms of which types of interaction that we’d want to address. Does every wallet need to accept every type of credential? What about verifiers? What interaction patterns do we want to support?
  7. The four areas are actually interconnected, and we’ll need to pinpoint the pain points of the related interactions.
  8. Had a discussion on meeting cadence.
    1. Suggestion of W, F next week; M, W, F thereafter
    2. Decided on the following next three calls
      1. Wednesday, April 7, 23:00 GMT
      2. Friday, April 9, 14:00 GMT
      3. Monday, April 12, 23:00 UTC
    3. Review and revise going forward, as this may still be problematic for APJ
  9. Discussion on asynchronous interactions. When we come together, it should be reporting back on conversations that have happened in the intervening time. It will be vital for the working of this group.
  10. Questions for use when considering of the four areas:
    1. What are you/your company doing now?
    2. What are you/your company willing to do?
  11. Review of the key interoperability questions. We have a document where people can put their thoughts on these questions.
  12. We should have a mutual check-in with some of other drafting groups to compare progress, particularly with the Paper Credentials drafting group. This will probably happen at the group lead level. Co-chairs will get this sorted.

...