Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

<insert proposed governance policies and procedures>

The MM&T WG will have a (small) 'governing committee' (GC) that

  • oversees the work that is being done to further/fulfill its mission as described above, which consists at least of the following:,
    • function, at least initially, as a modeling committee (MC) for the mental model on 'Mental Models', and how to CRUD them. 
    • define the artefacts that constitute the 'body of knowledge' (BoK) of the MM&T WG, which document all mental models and terminology that the WG governs.
    • define artefacts that may be considered for CRUDding the BoK of the MM&T WG mental models, as well as criteria that must be satisfied in order for such artefacts to be considered.
    • define the process that considers  such artefacts (that satisfy the criteria), and produces a decision saying whether or not to update the BoK, and if so, how the BoK will be updated.
    • define concrete artefacts (e.g. web pages, ...) that are to be generated from the BoK. Such artefacts are part of the results/products that the MM&T WG aims to produce.
    • ensure that technology is available that automatically generates and updates such artefacts from the BoK (particularly as it is changed).
  • connects/liaises to the other WGs within ToIP as well as groups/organizations outside ToIP, e.g. relevant W3C groups, DIF, ... for the purpose of furthering the work of both the ToIP MM&T WG and that of the other groups, insofar that is considered useful.
  • ...

The MM&T WG will have at least one 'modeling committee' (MC) that oversees the construction and maintenance of mental models that are relevant within ToIP, consisting of carefully defined concepts, relations between them and the constraints involved. In order to refer to these, the committee will choose labels that appropriate with in the scope of its own work. Each mental model will also be associated to 'stories' (visions, use-cases, ...) that explain it, or identify pitfalls etc.,  in terms of what is understandable in other domains (e.g. legal, business, ...), using labels that exist in that context if they nicely map onto concepts or relations, or otherwise introducing/suggesting other labels.