Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: added consortia

...

  • Can the network survive without cheqd? - can't make that promise but the governance documentation describes how in the future the governance would become decentralized and cheqd would become just another node on the network, but some entity would need to maintain the governance.
  • How do you avoid free rider problems or other gaming incentives - tricky in a decentralized ecosystem so they don't want to be specifically choosing who can become a node but they do have tiers of grants and can set requirements such as requiring contributing membership to an external organization such as DIF or ToIP etc.
  • how does a specific use case work in the cheqd network? - e.g. metaverse (an uncrowded, currently undeveloped field) - a SSI vendor has been developing SSI avatars that can port reputation. Cheqd understands the use case from an end user. Cheqd can then connect them to other partners that is an SSI vendor that can work with the specific (avatar) use case. They can be matched and use the cheqd network to build the partnership and then they will ultimately have the opportunity to join the network
  • How does the use of payment rails let you keep the interaction between verifier and holder without going back to the payment rail (centralized who will see all interactions)
    • it is not necessary that payment is released each time and therefore the payment rail is not accessed.
    • Phil: "Consortia" - ecosystem members that organize within the network amongst themselves, perhaps with common legal/commercial terms. Is a "Consortium" defined by the platform operator or does it emerge independently?


Admin Reminder : remember to re-subscribe to new meeting calendar

...