...
Time | Agenda Item | Lead | Notes | ||||||
3 min |
| Chairs |
| ||||||
5 min | General announcements | All | Any news and updates of general interest to CTWG members
| ||||||
2 min | Review of previous action items | Chairs |
| ||||||
5 min | Volunteers for the Decentralized SSI Governance white paper conversion | We had no less than ten volunteers respond to the call for volunteers above. Plus one ToIP member who had issues with the content of the paper. But our own Nicky Hickman went beyond volunteering and actually did the conversion of the paper! Rieks said would like to go ahead and publish the paper with the 2022 approval date. That would indicate that the paper was current as of that date. Rieks then suggested that we could invite people to begin to work on a V3. ACTION: Rieks Joosten, Nicky Hickman, and Drummond Reed to draft a ToIP blog post to announce the paper, explain the late publication, and inviting others to contribute to further work on the paper. Nicky Hickman will start the post using the standard ToIP blog post template that Judith has already created. ACTION: Drummond Reed to thank all the volunteers. Nicky suggested that we could set up a wiki page of volunteer tasks. .How should we proceed? | |||||||
5 min | Update on EasyCLA issue | Brian reported that the workflow is still manual. He did coach Henk van Cann on how to accomplish a glossary generation manually. He also shared that one solution is that a bot could create the PR and a human (who is EasyCLA authorized) could approve it. Once we have that workflow in place, it might be easier for a bot to also merge the request, but we can tackle that when we get there. Rieks was in favor of moving forward as quickly as possible. | |||||||
5 min | Update on TEv2 progress | Brian Richter has hired another person that will help him out on the work. @chadha is still having some trouble with integration, but the TRRT seems to work. We have labeled MRG issues with prio=high that need to be done first, prio=medium that need to be done next. There are some feature requests that have not been prioritized. Overall prio is to get the long-term tools up and running, so minimal effort will be spent on fixing stuff that will be phased out (dhh's tools). After MRGT, Brian will work on HRGT, and we expect TRRT will be ready when HRGT Is. | |||||||
30 min | Mental Model Development Process | In our last meeting, Rieks suggested the following steps in the development of a mental model:
Drummond and Neil are wondering about the best way to go about this process prior to starting to draft the specification. In other words, how can we at least start building a mental model during stages 1 thru 6 of the development stages in this table before we get to the spec drafting stage (recognizing that the mental model will be further improved during the Working Draft stage)? Rieks Joosten shared that he's been doing some work on mental model development for Qualified Data Exchange. He shared the following PDF.
Rieks explained an example of a full QDX ecosystem (screenshot #1 below) and the basic model behind it (screenshot #2). He pointed out that this model works regardless of whether it is offline or online, manual or automated. The whole point is to mitigate the risks in collecting and processing data in order to achieve an objective by validating the data. | |||||||
5 mins |
| Chairs |
Screenshots/Diagrams (numbered for reference in notes above)
#1
#2
#3
Decisions
- Sample Decision Item
...