Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

There was also brief discussion of two others: TRAIN, from the Fraunhofer Institute, and the W3C Verified Issuer/Verified Verifier model.


An elegant solution to work X.509 into DIDs - use alternative names field of the X.509 certificate to include the DID reference. No need to create a separate DID method to work with X.509.

Eric ​​Scouten at Adobe also co-chairs the X.509 VID Task Force at ToIP (meets every other week, Thursdays 8:30AM PT—I attend most meetings). The goal is to build a bridge between X.509 certs and decentralized identifiers (DIDs/VIDs) so that an ecosystem or an issuer does not have to choose one or the other. After researching all the options, it has become clear the best one is also the easiest: just publish a DID/VID in the Subject Alternative Name field of the X.509 cert. That makes it easy to go from the cert to the DID/VID. (To go in the other direction—from the DID document to the X.509 cert—there are several options, including putting a specific service endpoint type in the DID document.)

To do a sanity check with the IIW community on this design and on the value of an X.509-to-DID/VID bridge, on Thursday Eric and I called a session together with WebTrust auditor Scott Perry and BC Gov ​​architecture Stephen Curran (who had already given his Last Great DID Method session). We had a number of X.509 savvy architects and developers attend, plus a woman from Digicert who used to work on X.509 at Adobe.


Decisions


Action Items


Coming up