Attendees

• Brent Zundel, Co-chair
• Daniel Bachenheimer, Co-chair
• Drummond Reed
• Kaliya Young, Co-chair & WG Co-chair
• Pam Dingle
• Riley Hughes
• Tony Rose
• Trev Harmon
• Viky Manaila

Agenda Items

Recording - Link

Notes

• Did the IP and antitrust announcement.
• Today we are working on getting all of the outstanding comments cleared from our draft.
• Added citation for the WACI-PEx specification.
• There may need to be some additional information regarding how DID-based and X.509-based systems can play together. This doesn’t need to be a long discussion, but we need to be more technically specific.
• Drummond noted that the current approach is that X.509 systems would need to provide a URI that would provide a DID method. The Trust Registries draft also needs the same language.
• Drummond is meeting with Savita and Steve in an hour to work on the updated diagrams.
• It’s been agreed that an example verifiable presentation definition. There was a discussion about where that would/should exist.
• We had a discussion regarding the OIDC interaction.
• Tony joined, so we returned to the verifiable presentation discussion.
• Brent explained how the presentation definition allowed for multiple ways for the presentation to be fulfilled.
• Drummond noted that what we really need is a section that outlines the specifications for someone to be able to build a solution.
• Drummond will be going through the glossary again, which should pick up the new suggestions made by Daniel.

Chat Log

00:50:22	Trev Harmon:	Bookmark in the Rules Engines draft to the section that Tony mentioned: https://docs.google.com/document/d/12YcZDff3qHlNN7QdLh-v8ohkZGYrJgFN1IWgxNtt1c8/edit#bookmark=id.8l0h5minob9w
00:50:23	Drummond Reed:	That presentation definition is the nugget of gold at the very heart of the GHP recommendations!

Action Items

1. Complete assigned and open sections by Sunday night.
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   TBC