Co-Leads: Jo Spencer John Phillips
Attendees: sankarshan
| 2 min | Welcome & Antitrust Policy Notice | Jo/John |
| Introductions (if new joiners) | Jo/John | |
| Discussion around taking the WIP Addendum document (see below) forward | Everyone |
John and Sankarshan went through the discussion in the Airline and Guardianship document (key resource 5 below). Two main points discussed:
1) The ability of the airlines to act upon advice that a guardianship arrangement has been changed/terminated (original comment was "Additionally, airlines could be notified by authority if there's court order to disallow pax to travel. This will be initiated by the authority on a case by case basis (xxx will be traveling on specific date, do not allow flying). Airlines will be the first line of defense before immigration"). Discussion with reference to Guardianship Credentials was that if the issuing authority of the jurisdiction were to revoke the guardianship credential, then this would serve as an additional safety net (it would still be useful to receive the communication so that the guardian could be advised as to why they are not being allowed to travel)
2) The passenger contactless flow through scenario becomes interesting when we consider a group of passengers including independent travelling adults, and dependent travellers with their carers. In order to have an automated process, we will need to consider an interaction which, for each person, asks if they are travelling alone or with dependents. If alone, then only their credentials are asked for as proof, if with dependents, then they need to provide their dependent's credentials too. This demands some thinking about how to make this as simple, and robust, as possible and will require discussion with ground operations experts.
Guardianship and other forms of delegated authority with self-sovereign identity (Manning Live Book)
No recording for this session.
Action Items
2021-07-27
2021-08-10
2021-08-17